This is best demonstrated by an
example.
For the historical pattern, let’s
take a search for new credit variable, for example, # of Inquiries in
last 24 months with 5 bins 0 Inq, 1 Inq, 2-3, 4-5, and 6 or more. The
final table is shown below:
# IQ 24 M | History | Proposed | |||||
Bin
|
Counts
|
Accepts
|
Reject
|
Accept %
|
Accepts
|
Reject
|
Accept %
|
0 | 2,000 | 1,700 | 300 | 85% | 1,800 | 200 | 90% |
1 | 4,000 | 3,500 | 500 | 88% | 3,500 | 500 | 88% |
2-3 | 4,000 | 3,000 | 1,000 | 75% | 3,200 | 800 | 80% |
4-5 | 3,000 | 2,000 | 1,000 | 67% | 1,900 | 1,100 | 63% |
6+ | 2,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 50% | 800 | 1,200 | 40% |
Total | 15,000 | 11,200 | 3,800 | 75% | 11,200 | 3,800 | 75% |
Here’s the explanation for this
table. During the development time frame, we had 15,000 applicants,
11,200 were accepted and 3,800 were rejected for a 75% accept rate
(it doesn’t matter how many were booked). 2,000 applicants had no
inquiries and of those 300 were rejected. 4,000 had 1 inquiry and 500
of those were rejected, … . Basically, you need to a cross tab for
each of the variables against the Accept/Reject flag. For the
Proposed A/R, rank order the population by the new score and then
assume that any account that is in the bottom 25% (historical reject
rate) is a reject according to the proposed model and anything in the
top 75% is an accept.
Return to FAMQ
Return to FAMQ
No comments:
Post a Comment